I'm trying to square this with my not being able to find this update: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:2098 which has libvirt-7.0.0-14.module+el8.4.0+10886+79296686 and is listed for: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Virtualization 8 which I don't see on my RHEL 8 machines: Available Packages libvirt.x86_64 6.0.0-37.module+el8.5.0+12162+40884dd2 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms I do have a very updated libvirt on my CentOS Stream 8 machine: libvirt-7.10.0-1.module_el8.6.0+1046.... Any more insight would be appreciated, thanks. On 11/16/21 06:11, Igor Raits wrote: > Hi Danilo, > > Thanks for the very quick response! And thanks Sandro for including relevant > people (as it was hard for me to find appropriate emails). > > Have a great day, > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:04 PM Danilo de Paula <ddepaula at redhat.com > <mailto:ddepaula at redhat.com>> wrote: > > Yes, until RHEL 8.5 the latest-and-greatest virt packages used to be > shipped within Advanced Virtualization. But since AV packages are part of > RHEL now, there's no need for updating the SIG anymore because RHEL has > the most updated packages and, by consequence, c8s should have those > builds too. > > > > On Tue., Nov. 16, 2021, 7:25 a.m. Sandro Bonazzola, <sbonazzo at redhat.com > <mailto:sbonazzo at redhat.com>> wrote: > > +Eduardo Lima <mailto:etrunko at redhat.com> +Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula > <mailto:ddepaula at redhat.com> > > Il giorno mar 16 nov 2021 alle ore 12:52 Igor Raits > <igor.raits at gmail.com <mailto:igor.raits at gmail.com>> ha scritto: > > Hello, > > I've noticed that the latest c8s repos ship libvirt/qemu-kvm (and > other related things) newer than the advanced virtualization > repository… which brings me to a question if it is still worth > using those builds or not? > > I've been trying to dig into some mailing list conversations > (which are pretty much non-existent at this point) and IRC > meetings (which I did not see in October, but found one in > November[1]). Found only mention that libvirt/qemu will not be > available for power arches since c9s and that's what probably virt > sig will build (if my understanding of meeting minutes are correct). > > Any piece of information would be very helpful :) > > > [1] > https://www.centos.org/minutes/2021/November/centos-meeting.2021-11-03-17.03.log.html > <https://www.centos.org/minutes/2021/November/centos-meeting.2021-11-03-17.03.log.html> > > > > -- > > Sandro Bonazzola > > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > > sbonazzo at redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo at redhat.com> > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > ** > *Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need > to answer this email out of your office hours. > * > * > > * > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Orion Poplawski IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion at nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3847 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20220131/688664f6/attachment-0002.p7s>