Hi, On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL > under Projects at issues.redhat.com. > What is the correct project for RHEL 9 ? > You have to file a bug for "distribution" component in Bugzilla. Regards B. > > Thanks > > --- > Lee > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:14 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities! > > > > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release > > cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring > > 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release > > will start in earnest in the very near future. As some of you may > > know, Red Hat has been using both Bugzilla and Jira via > > issues.redhat.com for RHEL development for several years. Our > > intention is to move to using issues.redhat.com only for the major > > RHEL releases after RHEL 9. > > > > What does this mean for Fedora and CentOS? This discussion is in part > > to figure that out. Based on some very brief analysis, the following > > should hold: > > > > - RHEL customers should continue to file support cases through the Red > > Hat Customer portal, which will remain consistent regardless of the > > backend tooling used. > > > > - There is no imminent retirement of the Red Hat Bugzilla instance > > being planned at this time. RHEL 7, 8, and 9 will continue to use > > bugzilla in some form and RHEL 9 has a very long lifecycle. > > > > - Fedora Linux and EPEL have their own Bugzilla product families and > > are not directly impacted in their own workflows by the choice to use > > only issues.redhat.com for RHEL. > > - There will be impacts on existing documentation that provide > > guidance on requesting things from RHEL in various places like EPEL. > > We will be happy to help adjust these. > > > > - CentOS Stream contribution and bug reporting workflows will be > > adjusted to use issues.redhat.com instead of bugzilla in the relevant > > places. This should apply to all versions of CentOS Stream for a > > unified contributor workflow. This will happen gradually as we > > discover the best workflow to use. > > > > If there are other impacts that you can think of, please raise them on > > this thread. We’d like to ensure we’re covering as much as possible > > as this rolls out. > > > > josh > > _______________________________________________ > > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave at lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Branislav Náter Principal Quality Engineer, Stacks QE IRC: bnater at #qa #urt #brno Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20220519/7081733f/attachment.html>