On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 08:09, lejeczek via CentOS-devel < centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > Hi guys. > > that most certainly should not be, right? > > -> $ dnf list libknet1 > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:37 ago on Fri 09 Sep 2022 10:44:07 > BST. > Installed Packages > libknet1.x86_64 > 1.24-2.el8 @ha > Available Packages > libknet1.i686 > 1.24-2.el8 ha > libknet1.i686 > 1.24-2.el8 powertools > > but in case it should then the problem is: > > -> $ dnf update > ... > Error: > Problem 1: package libknet1-compress-bzip2-plugin-1.24-3.el8.x86_64 > requires libknet1(x86-64) = 1.22-1.el8, but none of the providers can be > installed > THe problem isn't that it is in two repos (that is ok since a user may have one or the other or both and the versions are the same) The problem is that the plugin somehow requires a version which only existed when it was built versus its 'sister' package. I would expect a spec problem. > - cannot install both libknet1-1.22-1.el8.x86_64 and > libknet1-1.24-2.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > libknet1-compress-bzip2-plugin-1.24-2.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > libknet1-1.24-2.el8.x86_64 > > many thanks, L. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20220909/e9ad4d85/attachment-0002.html>