Phill, I don't see firefox-91.13.0-1.el9 in RHEL. On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 1:56 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel < centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > Am 11.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Branislav Náter: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 8:46 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel > > <centos-devel at centos.org <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org>> wrote: > > > > I wonder about the current firefox build 91.13.0-1.el9? Its not on > the > > mirrors (comp 20220829) nor in the last prod compose (20220909) / > both > > lists firefox-91.11.0-2.el9 ... Thanks. > > > > > > For inclusion in the compose, it has to pass testing. Testing is still > > in progress. > > > > Hey, sure. It misses the c9s-candidate tag but to make my question more > clearly: 91.11. is in the repos, 91.13. builded, but why is 91.12. still > not verified and tagged with c9s-pending (as I understand the proccess)? > > Would the version in the "middle" be still blocked because of an > embargo? Would the newer version not make such embargo immediately > obsolete? > I don't want to speak on behalf of the RHEL Firefox team, but I would guess that they are now focusing on releasing firefox-91.13.0-1.el9 for CentOS (thus skipping 91.12). Sorry to not provide more info. > > https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328 > > -- > Thanks > Leon > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > Regards -- Branislav Náter Principal Quality Engineer, Stacks QE IRC: bnater at #qa #urt #brno Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20220911/e4b941fb/attachment-0002.html>