I have no idea why you are not seeing it, but it's been there for 2 and a half weeks on my installs:: $ rpm -qi firefox Name : firefox Version : 91.13.0 Release : 1.el9_0 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Wed 24 Aug 2022 06:19:44 PM EDT Group : Unspecified Size : 277674420 License : MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ Signature : RSA/SHA256, Mon 22 Aug 2022 03:47:12 AM EDT, Key ID 199e2f91fd431d51 Source RPM : firefox-91.13.0-1.el9_0.src.rpm Build Date : Thu 18 Aug 2022 03:25:16 AM EDT Build Host : x86-64-02.build.eng.rdu2.redhat.com Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> Vendor : Red Hat, Inc. URL : https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/ Summary : Mozilla Firefox Web browser Description : Mozilla Firefox is an open-source web browser, designed for standards compliance, performance and portability. On 11/09/2022 13:53, Branislav Náter wrote: > Phill, I don't see firefox-91.13.0-1.el9 in RHEL. > > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 1:56 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel > <centos-devel at centos.org <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org>> wrote: > > Am 11.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Branislav Náter: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 8:46 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel > > <centos-devel at centos.org <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org> > <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org>>> > wrote: > > > > I wonder about the current firefox build 91.13.0-1.el9? Its > not on the > > mirrors (comp 20220829) nor in the last prod compose > (20220909) / both > > lists firefox-91.11.0-2.el9 ... Thanks. > > > > > > For inclusion in the compose, it has to pass testing. Testing is > still > > in progress. > > > > Hey, sure. It misses the c9s-candidate tag but to make my question more > clearly: 91.11. is in the repos, 91.13. builded, but why is 91.12. > still > not verified and tagged with c9s-pending (as I understand the proccess)? > > Would the version in the "middle" be still blocked because of an > embargo? Would the newer version not make such embargo immediately > obsolete? > > I don't want to speak on behalf of the RHEL Firefox team, but I would > guess that they are now focusing on releasing firefox-91.13.0-1.el9 for > CentOS (thus skipping 91.12). Sorry to not provide more info. > > > https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328 > <https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328> > > -- > Thanks > Leon > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel at centos.org> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel> > > > Regards > -- > Branislav Náter > Principal Quality Engineer, Stacks QE > IRC: bnater at #qa #urt #brno > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic > redhat.com <http://redhat.com> | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | > redhat.com/trusted <http://redhat.com/trusted> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel