On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:28 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:00 PM Amy Marrich <amy at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > And that was the intent of the discussions. We would start the SiG with the x86-64 work and then possibly rename it down the road to be more of an umbrella for folks wanting to do similar things. The intent was never for Florian to do anything but the x86 work. > > > > If folks are good with the ISA SiG name we can just go with that from the start. > > This seems like a good compromise. > > Florian, I'll find whatever documentation that says we need to open a > Board ticket for the SIG this week and get that moving with the ISA > SIG name. I have the board ticket open now: https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issue/115 Thanks again for all who have contributed to the discussion so far. josh