On 28/02/2023 10:21, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:05 AM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org > <mailto:arrfab at centos.org>> wrote: > > Let's start discussing the future of wiki.centos.org > <http://wiki.centos.org> ! > > There was a CentOS Docs SIG day happening on monday after Fosdem and > during that day, we started to discuss the future of wiki.centos.org > <http://wiki.centos.org>. > > As a reminder : https://wiki.centos.org <https://wiki.centos.org> is > actually powered by moin > (http://moinmo.in/ <http://moinmo.in/>), which is : > - python 2.x based > - unmaintained > > It's also running on CentOS Linux 7 (for these requirements), itself > going EOL next year. Also worth adding that it's under constant spammer > load, with plenty of bots trying to write content, be denied, and > trying > in a different way, so it's really a "whack a mole" game. > > For all these reasons, it has to be replaced by something else, > (still a > wiki) or even better, be decommissioned entirely and eventually > moved to > a git workflow. > > FWIW, it's what is used for all websites from various SIGs under > https://sigs.centos.org <https://sigs.centos.org> (including the SIG > guide itself, > https://sigs.centos.org/guide <https://sigs.centos.org/guide>) > > As a follow-up on the CentOS SIG day, an investigation (see > https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/1061 > <https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/1061>) was started as a PoC to > just > extract wiki content in a readable (static) format, so that we can > still > host a "read-only" version (archived) of wiki content, while a new > service (wiki or else) would replace it. > > All comments/remarks are welcome, and let's have a plan about what > to do > (the sooner, the better) > > Kind Regards, > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org <https://www.centos.org> > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org <http://fosstodon.org>] > > > Just wanted to add that there was a talk on this subject earlier: > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2022-August/thread.html#120541 <https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2022-August/thread.html#120541> > "What to do with wiki.centos.org <http://wiki.centos.org> ? (let's > discuss it)" > > Akemi > True, but reason why I started another one is for one reason : starting a thread is easy but there is usually no action plan/follow-up (as you can see from previous thread), reason why I'm asking again the centos-docs SIG to take action, and expose a plan :) So it's a matter of prioritizing the work to be done, taking a decision about "where to go next", and then decommission wiki (the last step will happen for sure, no matter what will be done or not before) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230228/eeaaaf26/attachment.sig>