On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 03:12, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > Let's discuss https://bugs.centos.org ! > > For a long time, we used to only have one public tracker , powered by > MantisBT (https://mantisbt.org/) , and it was https://bugs.centos.org > > Due to various changes in the CentOS ecosystem in the last years, some > categories were removed/migrated elsewhere : > > - CentOS infra tracker : https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issues > - CentOS Stream : https://bugzilla.redhat.com > > Some other SIGs also started to have (and document) their own tracker > (see https://wiki.centos.org/ReportBugs) > > So the question is : while we can easily migrate bugs.centos.org to el9, > should we ? > > All comments/remarks are welcome, and let's have a plan about what to do > > I think it would be best to sunset this by locking and keeping the system as read-only after the 2024 end of CentOS Stream 8 and CentOS 7. At that point it can be scraped and put on archive.org or something similar and 'removed' with a 'thank you for your hard work'. > Kind Regards, > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org] > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230227/bfecce53/attachment-0002.html>