* Marcin Juszkiewicz: > W dniu 27.02.2023 o 22:54, Josh Boyer pisze: >>> I also would not suggest calling this the x86 SIG, since that is >>> misleading. Consider expanding to compiler flag analysis and tuning > >> I don't think it's misleading at all. > > My first thought was "Oh, no! Someone wants to revive 32-bit x86 back > from grave!" so yes, it is misleading. I really thought the meaning has largely shifted to 64 bits now, like it previously shifted from 16 bits to 32 bits. If - will be allowed in all the required places (except the RPM architecture name itself), we can certainly call it the x86-64 SIG. Thanks, Florian