On 02/03/2023 06:20, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Fabian Arrotin: > >> On 27/02/2023 18:23, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> # Goals >>> >> <snip> >>> Resources >>> They SIG could benefit from spare x86-64 Koji builder capacity. >>> >> >> Can you elaborate on that ? You mean just using existing x86_64 >> builders (matching x86-64-v2 specs but nothing like v3), right ? >> Just trying to capture things before it's even just accepted as a SIG >> .. and not after, realizing that we wouldn't have what you're >> searching for :) > > I think the CentOS builders are already compatible with x86-64-v4, so no > configuration changes are needed. I verified that for > x86-02.stream.rdu2.redhat.com: it reports all the necessary CPU > features. > Well, yes, but that's not the infra that SIGs are using either : Stream is itself built elsewhere (different koji/infra), reason why I was asking if you need something on the infra *where* SIGs are building packages (older than the Stream infra) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230302/107fb7c6/attachment-0002.sig>