On 18/04/2023 14:35, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 29/03/2023 09:17, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 27/02/2023 15:55, Stephen Smoogen wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 03:12, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org >>> <mailto:arrfab at centos.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Let's discuss https://bugs.centos.org <https://bugs.centos.org> ! >>> >>> For a long time, we used to only have one public tracker , >>> powered by >>> MantisBT (https://mantisbt.org/ <https://mantisbt.org/>) , and it >>> was https://bugs.centos.org <https://bugs.centos.org> >>> >>> Due to various changes in the CentOS ecosystem in the last years, >>> some >>> categories were removed/migrated elsewhere : >>> >>> - CentOS infra tracker : https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issues >>> <https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issues> >>> - CentOS Stream : https://bugzilla.redhat.com >>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com> >>> >>> Some other SIGs also started to have (and document) their own >>> tracker >>> (see https://wiki.centos.org/ReportBugs >>> <https://wiki.centos.org/ReportBugs>) >>> >>> So the question is : while we can easily migrate bugs.centos.org >>> <http://bugs.centos.org> to el9, >>> should we ? >>> >>> All comments/remarks are welcome, and let's have a plan about >>> what to do >>> >>> >>> I think it would be best to sunset this by locking and keeping the >>> system as read-only after the 2024 end of CentOS Stream 8 and CentOS >>> 7. At that point it can be scraped and put on archive.org >>> <http://archive.org> or something similar and 'removed' with a 'thank >>> you for your hard work'. >> >> >> Not a lot of momentum/traction on this thread, so that summarizes it >> all I guess :) >> It's true that https://bugs.centos.org isn't even used at all by >> centos stream team , nor infra team so I just intend to decommission >> it entirely ASAP, and I'll just send mail when I'll do that (as >> hypervisor on which that VM is running needs also be reinstalled). I >> don't see a benefit in moving that VM/service is nobody is using it >> and keeping it running on c7 until 2024 when we'll just shut it down >> anyway. >> >> So, famous last words : "speak now or stay quiet forever" :) >> >> > > FWIW, I'll shutdown that service/instance in two weeks from now, remove > it from DNS and we can then update https://wiki.centos.org/ReportBugs > (itself disappearing soon) to reflect that it will be either Stream > related (so going to bugzilla.redhat.com) or infra related (and so on > pagure.io/centos-infra/issues) > VM is now powered off and service removed from DNS. https://wiki.centos.org/ReportBugs was also updated to reflect the two only options : - bugzilla.redhat.com for everything CentOS Stream related - pagure.io/centos-infra/issues for infra tasks/tickets Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230510/fa57abd2/attachment.sig>