[Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again
Johnny Hughes
mailing-lists at hughesjr.comFri Nov 3 12:16:13 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again
- Next message: [Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:01 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Opinions, please. > > Anyone? > Personally, I think openpub is the best choice. It is what Red Hat and Fedora Core use on all their documentation. It does require (though) a page that tracks version/revision with the author listed, so may not be easily doable for a wiki. It is what the "Managing Software with Yum" doc is licensed under (for example): http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/yum/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20061103/d4a96f7c/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again
- Next message: [Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-docs mailing list