[Centos-docs] howto's and docs from the forums

[Ralph Angenendt]

danieldk at pobox.com wrote:
>> opinions ?
> 
> Something that may be important in the longer run: do we ask that people
> provide content under a specific license? At this point in time it is
> still possible to add such requirement, it would be more difficult to do
> it retroactively.

Wow. Anyone firm with the (sometimes rather strange) CC wording on their
licenses? I never really thought about that for a wiki and I really do
have a hard time choosing one of those licences.

They have a wiki license (licence or license? What is it?)
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> - or at least they
promote that for usage on Wikis. 

But is this really what we/you/they/others want?

Ralph
-- 
Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one
Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other
Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20061002/98b5ced5/attachment.bin