Hello folks, Just did the modifications below; Testing the new page, I found that the link corresponding to the testing/SRPMS subdir of the latest version is broken (i.e, http://dev.centos.org/centos/4.4/testing/SRPMS/ fails because http://dev.centos.org/centos/4.4 does not exist). On the other hand, that same directory structure exists for the previous versions (i.e, http://dev.centos.org/centos/4.3/testing/SRPMS/ is there). I've also found a "4.4beta" subdir, but also without the aforementioned subdirectories). So who fixes it? Best Regards, -- Durval Menezes (durval AT tmp DOT com DOT br, http://www.tmp.com.br/) On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:36:23PM -0300, Durval Menezes wrote: > Hello Folks, > > > From: Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> > > Message-ID: <20060911151155.GE9646 at br-online.de> > > > > Durval Menezes wrote: > > > Hello Folks, > > > Any sugestions, critics, corrections etc are welcome. > > > > It's unfortunately (Check http://dev.centos.org/; unfortunatelly). > > Ooops... just fixed it. But then that's English: folks write > "actually" and "specially", but old dame Fortune only gets a > single "l" when she's adjectivated... (btw: English is actually > my 3rd language, and I learned it mostly on the streets... anyone > knows if there's a rule for when to use "single l" or "double l"?) > > > And > > the line about Checking for Version 4.2 and 4 - shouldn't new packages > > only be accepted for the current update version? > > I don't know, but I get the impression yours was a rhetoric question :-) > I'm changing the text right now so that the would-be contributer will be > directed to check just the current version. > > Best Regards, > -- > Durval Menezes (durval AT tmp DOT com DOT br, http://www.tmp.com.br/)