I don't have any problems with this license ... the only page I've contributed to is some mockups and one artwork set. Which brings up the question that since 5 has been released should this be cleaned-up to just the final artwork? Regards, Paul Berger On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 14:46 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Okay, this will never come to an end otherwise: > > I would like to use <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/> as > the license for the complete content of the wiki. > > The content on the wiki is *NOT* licensed at all at the moment. > > So this call goes out to *ALL* people who have already contributed to > the wiki: > > Is it okay with you to use this license for your content on the wiki? > > If yes: Say yes (and tell us which page you contributed content to). > > If no: Say no (and tell us which page you contributes content to). > > I know that there are some contributors not on this mailing list, I will > contact them separately *after* I got some responses from you. > > Please answer *as soon* as possible, because if you do not answer, I > have to assume that you are *against* this license. > > So keep the responses rolling in! > > Cheers, > > Ralph > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs