[CentOS-docs] subscribed wiki pages

On Dec 9, 2007 4:07 PM, R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > I still have never received a subscription change notice on
> > pages I later see have changed.
>
> Thinking further, it is possible that I have procmail filters
> in play.   To help me run this down, could a person actually
> having such a notice of change, publish the full headers of a
> single piece into this thread, please?

This is the header of such a mail :

Delivered-To: tim.verhoeven.be at gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.8.18 with SMTP id 18cs38186anh;
        Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.23.5 with SMTP id a5mr4491929ugj.1197146246471;
        Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <noreply at centos.org>
Received: from centosx.centos.org
(162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com [72.232.194.162])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k28si2801837ugd.2007.12.08.12.37.25;
        Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 72.232.194.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by best guess record for domain of noreply at centos.org)
client-ip=72.232.194.162;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
72.232.194.162 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record
for domain of noreply at centos.org) smtp.mail=noreply at centos.org
Received: from centosx.centos.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by centosx.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDCA404D;
	Sat,  8 Dec 2007 20:37:24 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: noreply at centos.org
To: noreply at centos.org
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:37:24 -0000
Message-ID: <20071208203724.13929.9811 at centosx.centos.org>
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCentOS_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22QaTeam=22_by_FabianArrotin?=

Regards,
Tim

-- 
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be at gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem  magically goes away  by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)