On Dec 10, 2007 1:36 AM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > Sorry, I spoke too soon. Just checked the spam filter implemented by > > my work place and the e-mail was trapped there. It was caught > > probably because of utf-8 characters on the subject line and/or the > > sender name "noreply". > > Hmm? > > As Tim's mail showed, moin goes out of it's way to *not* put utf-8 data > into the subject line, but to encode it, so that it is 7bit clean. > > Cheers, > > Ralph OK, to see how the trapped e-mail was analyzed, I went to see the report section of the filter: === Spam Analysis Report (Score = 3.2) === 0.6 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.1 COMBINED_FROM From address suggests this is spam 0.0 SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP Subject: quoted-printable encoded unnecessarily 0 SPF query returned 'none' Custom Rule 24: (2.5 points) sender contains noreply [Note: done by our network guy] Word: Password (0.079) Word: password+please (0.060) Word: password+Login (0.054) Word: email+lost (0.054) Word: s*Wiki (0.041) Word: lost+password (0.035) Word: use+data (0.031) Word: use+copy (0.027) Word: requested+submit (0.020) Word: Login+Name (0.013) Word: wiki+centos (0.010) Word: UserPreferences (0.010) Word: s*wiki (0.010) Word: centos (0.010) Word: password+field (0.010) Score of 0 points due to statistical analysis === end of report === However, my real interest is not the filter issue. I have already whitelisted centos.org. But thing is I have yet to confirm the change notice e-mail gets sent to me. To increase the chance, I have added several more pages to the subscribed list. So someday one of those pages will be edited and I will get the answer to this question. Akemi