-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:55:37AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >and this time with a decision, please. > > > >Hi, > > > >I just had a talk with someone on IRC who wanted to reuse stuff from > ><http://wiki.centos.org/MarketingMaterial> and asked me about the > >licensing of content on there. > > > >Which made me think "Well, let us restart this discussion again". We > >*do* need a license for content on the wiki. The three licenses we're > >favouring (well, sort of) are: > > > >The GNU Free Documentation License > >CreativeCommons with attribution > >Open Documentation License > > > > CC with Attribution has my vote, however i am not a lawyer If I can vote, CC+Attrib has it. If not, it has my support :) []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF54Y+pdyWzQ5b5ckRAhFzAKCZtonzimGrsVgU6dk2S4xPTpsNNQCgonAQ N6gjEwoNF7WDO/2DtWFE9bE= =k9NS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----