Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:21:03AM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: >>> Otherwise it's a good idea, though 2.1 to 5 probably is "Don't even >>> think about it" }:-> >> Agreed; however, general guidance to update from major version x to x+1 >> before attempting x+2, or better yet do a fresh install, would cover >> that. I think the migration guides really should only aim to cover x to x+1 really, if someone wants to go from centos-2.1 to centos-5.0, they can and really should work through the process. > I don't even upgrade from x to x+1. It is a good way to end up with a lot > of garbage. Since we have a 2 year cycle for server replacement around > here, we usually do upgrades at the time (as a fresh install). Much safer. the aim here is to try and document this garbage, so as to reduce the amount of effort that end users need to put in, and so that there is some reasonable documented process of garbage identification and remedy action :) > > And for desktops, who cares ? :) this isnt a discussion list - the reason why the docs are created are not up for argument or reason really. We *know* that users are going to be doing upgrades and the aim is to try and make that as painless as possible by offering them some sort of a tested path. Eg. we all know what happened when centos-4 was released, inspite of everyone saying dont upgrade live machines, there were still quite a few people who did! - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq