On 10/7/07, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: ... > > http://wiki.centos.org/es?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wiki-structure-1-en.png > > Since we are discussing using the wiki as the website, we probably have to > move the Documentation one level deeper. > > > I would like to implement it in es/ page. Would it be convenient ? > > My preference would be that we keep the same layout and content as the > English page. ok. so here is a proposition to the English page ;) : http://wiki.centos.org/en?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wiki-structure-1-en.png What do you think ? Does it adapt to the needs ? Other suggestions ? Further, we could change the color of wiki header (now gray) and turn it dark blue with something nice and clear that give logo a little more of power. Just to see how it looks. > > Also, I would like to discuss a little about namespace. ... > > The case of HowTos/Network/SomePage, could it be just HowTos/SomePage > > ? Or, HowTos/Category/SomePage for all pages under HowTos. Another case is that of pages like MigratingTwoToFive and MigratingThreeToFive that are listed in HowTos/MigrationGuide page but its namespace don't say that, maybe they could be under HowTos/MigrationGuide/ too. > My preference would > go to using a fairly strict namespace that matches the structure of the > site: > > en/download/ > distributions/ > mirrors/ > search/ > en/documentation/ > faq/ > forum/ > howtos/ > mailinglist/ > procedures/ > tips-and-tricks/ > en/contribute/ > bugreports/ > sig/ > artwork/ > promo/ > virtualisation/ > todo/ > en/promote/ > events/ > networks/ > websites/ > en/donate/ > media/ > shirts/ > why/ > en/about/ > history/ > support/ > team/ > what/ > This namespace seems fine to me. Cheers, al.