[CentOS-docs] Added BackupPC Guide

Ralph Angenendt

ra+centos at br-online.de
Fri Dec 19 10:12:02 UTC 2008

Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Max Hetrick wrote:
> >> 1) It doesn't work on a 64-bit machine, since the Perl modules will be
> >> installed under /usr/lib64 but they will require '/usr/lib' instead.
> > 
> > My backup server isn't 64 bit, so I can't really say much here.
> Can the article not be made more Arch agnostic ?
> Question for EditGroup: do we have a policy on arch specific info ? 

Not that I know of.

> if not, is that something we should have ?

AFAICR this is the first time we hit a problem with software being arch
specific, so I don't think that it is a high priority issue. For release
specific information we put CentOS 3, CentOS 4, CentOS 5 sections into
documents, so maybe this is something which can/should be done as well
for arch specific information, too?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20081219/fd47e532/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS-docs mailing list