Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/Webcams > > I dont see the point of 'high end', 'midrange' and 'entry level' > sections. If there is any reason for it to be there, some info on howto > decide what section each webcam should go into should also be included > on the page. > Fine - removed. It was just an attempt to beak up the page and give it some structure. The important thing is the info that it works :) > But honestly, I dont see the point to that segmentation at all. People > will buy and use the webcam that works for them best, mostly looking for > the wiki as a means to work out which of those have been tested before > etc. So rather than doing the segmentation based on 'range' perhaps more > info on the camera / sample video + still output etc would go down a lot > better. > I didn't envisage turning it into a mini review of each cam - there's already plenty of those on youtube etc. What's missing is purely a list of cams that *will* work under CentOS, plus any relevant details for getting it working. I hope you'll add your Philips webcam to the list when you get a chance ;)