Hi Russ. >>> I wonder what in the world, which is material, you think is ** not ** >>> covereed between the Ed Bailey, and the Eric Foster-Johnson, the GuruLabs >>> resources (each down those links). > >> I am speaking about the CentOS Wiki and nothing more. I think pages like >> the Yum and RPM page should cover aspects of handling both tools and the >> build process should be described on a seperate page and linked from there. > > My question stands unanswered: 'what in the world, which is material, you > think is ** not ** covered' presently? > > Adding yet another secondary source, frankly written by people who are NOT > and have not been active in the builder, nor the RPM communities, does not > add light. > > I don't see an improvement for the CentOS brand by simply increasing > quantity. I think this is not just about increasing quantity. I agree that this should not be an option. And I definitely do not mean that the existing resources are bad (just not that well structured). The RPM Build process should be separated to a special page instead of being part of articles like 'Yum and RPM' or 'The Kernel Source' and of course your own great (but external) "Building Source RPM as non-root" tutorial. And maybe Filipe is not a RPM guru, but not being visible as RPM builder does not mean he has no experience in. I think it could just be an advantage if he restructures the content and adds his personal notes. If it's technically wrong I am sure you will correct it. Best Regards Marcus