Dag Wieers wrote: > Ralph, > > How do we work for SIGs ? Would a seperate group be useful per SIG, or do > we rather want to keep it simple and light ? Group for what? AccessGroup on the wiki? We're going to open up that part anyway in the near future. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080616/7c20bd05/attachment-0004.sig>