Msquared wrote: > > I can understand if you don't have the time to reformat your article to > > our wiki "typesetting", but I'm sure that we can work that out somehow - > > for example you put the stuff online, one of us then will go over it and > > format it correctly. > > > > How does that sound to you? > > Sure, go ahead. I have to admit that reformatting it was one reason for > some reluctance on my part. :-) Okay, let me think about that. > If you give me editing rights of that and relevant pages, I'll even keep > them up to date with new patches, improvements, etc. Good. I have no time at the moment, so it'll probably be tomorrow until I can get back to you with something more thought out. > Just as an aside: If the licensing requirements of the CentOS wiki are > compatible with the license of my article, you're welcome to copy/paste > and rewikify yourself. If not, I'm happy to do it myself and therefore > implicitly release it separately in compliance with the CentOS wiki > licensing requirements. > > My article's license is: > > http://www.msquared.id.au/articles/cryptroot/#LicenseAndCopyright But I wanted to answer this one: You use CC by SA 2.5 Australia, we use <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>, which is unported. But basically we have the same licenses, so I do not see any problems there. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080303/527d6302/attachment-0002.sig>