On 05/29/2008 06:13 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > Just a quick note for anyone who hadn't looked at the article but will > later do so. > > Re Daniel's point, that it does encourage the somewhat dangerous custom > kernel, I've edited it slightly. At this point, I suspect that it won't > be approved, because of the kernel issue, so I've also, in the editing, > used a bit of first person. > > If people did wind up thinking it should be included anyway, I can very > easily change that. > > Once again, thank you for your time and consideration. As it's > sometimes difficult to correctly interpret the tone of an email, let me > emphasize that I am not at all bothered by Daniel's reluctance--he made > a very important point about the kernel, one which I hadn't sufficiently > emphasized in the original page. My feeling is that even if it does > only stay on my own website, the point about the kernel should be made, > hence the editing. vserver is quite popular, especially among debian admins and even among hosting companies, so I am very much in favor of publishing this article.