Daniel de Kok wrote: > Of course, this would require a volunteer who is willing to maintain > such a set of patches against the kernel. But if someone is willing to > do this, it can profit from CentOS quality assurance, and guarantee > good compatibility with CentOS. Only if that person also wants to support that on the #irc channel and can explain why we support one type of vserver and don't support the other :) More when I have more time. Greetings from Linuxtag, Berlin Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080529/b45f1b86/attachment-0004.sig>