On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> Also, whilst undergoing this process, would it also be a good time to >> request and/or formalize a documentation SIG as there doesn't appear to >> be one at present. Presumably those who have raised their hands would be >> obvious candidates for such a SIG. > > Ummm. I thought this was it? Or please rephrase what you mean by > "documentation SIG" ... Well, it is listed under "Future SIGs": http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup Akemi