[CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution
Alan Bartlett
ajb.stxsl at googlemail.comFri Apr 17 22:01:42 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution
- Next message: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 17/04/2009, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at nasa.gov> wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:29 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: > > > >> Seems obvious to me after all this (and previous) discussion that some > >> more guidance on the "Contribute" page would help to clarify what is and > >> is not considered acceptable. Such a statement could be arrived at > >> either by consensus or by edict of a benevolent dictator. :-) > >> > >> Phil > > --- > > Ok now that conversation is taking place about it, it is time to decide > > what is exactly needs to be added. Like within 30 days. I'm not being > > demanding. Just realistic. > > > > JohnStanley > > +1 > > Let's not just let this fade into the sunset like the last couple of > similar discussions. > > Phil At present, Ralph is not around. He should be present and take part in this discussion. Does anyone know of his whereabouts and / or when he will be back? Perhaps Russ could please comment, re: Range? Alan.
- Previous message: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution
- Next message: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-docs mailing list