morenisco at cdsl.cl wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > It is a wiki, not a store for links to documents on another page. > > Wonderful, I can paste 20 pages there, do you prefer that? Well, the way you're doing it at the moment is just fine :) > >> Ohh shii...is not possible to keep a document with GFDL into a web site > >> with CC? > > > > I do not know offhand (but I don't think those two are compatible). > > Well Ralph, anyway, If I paste the 20 pages on the wiki, I will have the > problem with the licence. I want to be free to licence my documentation > with GFDL or another that could be enought free for me. And put pressure > for just one licence to use is not something that you could consider a > free act. If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? > Then, could we consider include the GFDL in the wiki (there could be a > message "This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share > Alike 3.0 Unported License or GFDL if specified?"), and I can paste the > content into the wiki? No, finding a license for the wiki was hard enough - I don't really like to put that on the footer of the page. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090217/5b4f2a1d/attachment-0004.sig>