On 06/01/2009, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: > > > >> I don't know why everyone seems to think we are going to change > *ANYTHING* > >> to the way the forums work. The only thing I asked to consider is > changing > >> the page title. Something a forum user would not even notice because > that > >> is *NOT* what they see anywhere, unless in your tab. And now all your > tabs > >> look like: "www.centos.org -" (if you can see that many characters) > > > > I assure you that I understood the point you were trying to make from > > the very beginning. > > > > What I did not know is that preventing unwanted portions of the title > > from appearing on google is technically possible. So, I thought the > > only way to achieve this was to remove them from the original Forum > > thread title. > > Ok, then I misunderstood you misunderstanding me ;-) Having just got back to my monitor to pick up and read the latest posts to this thread I'll say -- as it appears that I was the last person to post before your annoyance became visible, Dag -- that I had a similar misunderstanding to Akemi and the two paragraphs quoted before your quote, above, could just as well have been written by me rather than by Akemi. :-) [ot] And I thought you knew enough about me to realise that I am approachable? -- my e-mail address is visible for all to see. [/ot] Looking up at one of my Firefox tabs I see "www.centos.org - Forums - ...". That expands to read "www.centos.org - Forums - unread topics". Most definitely the "www.centos.org" could go from that . . . [ot] The English pedant feels a rant coming on. One forum, two or more fora. Just like one referendum, two or more referenda, etc. [/ot] Alan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090106/5c7ba641/attachment-0004.html>