-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralph Angenendt wrote: ... > Another question - would we (well you) be ready for a completely new > artwork within 5.3? Or should we "spare" treeflower for 6? I'd have to > run that by some people before we do so ... Well, what we have is here: https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/wiki/ThemeTreeFlower-1.1 I tried to cover each section but don't know if they are correct at all and if I missed something. I propose you to share this work with those people before take a decision, grab opinions, things that are missing, and anything else that avoid using the theme. That would give us an idea about the version it could be used in. What do you think ? Best Regards, - -- Alain Reguera Delgado <al at ciget.cienfuegos.cu> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJd06uyXxCQEoXDZARAgPVAJ4kijirKbIBWUe+tByC0Qs74CySTQCfUTRY xDaEZ5aAM5F7zbk/nqoZlHc= =OPf0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----