[CentOS-docs] wiki.centos.org logo behaviour

[Mats Karlsson]

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 03:51, Alan Bartlett <ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 16/05/2009, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:

Ok, lets summarize it:

Against: There is no hierarchy where www is the "top", the www site is
appalling, www isn't updated.

For: www has links to wiki, website, forums, mirrors, projects, bug.

And do I hear a split between the maintainers of www and wiki ? That's
unfortunate because that bad for CentOS branding and trust.

I dont see www and the wiki or the forum a it's own entity, its a part
of http://centos.org/ !?!? And if the http://centos.org/ is crap
shouldn't it be addressed and discussed in a proper topic so it can be
redesigned ? And I agree the http://centos.org/ is looking like a pole
with adds on it.


So my question is it a hierarchy with http://centos.org/ on the top
and bugs and wiki as subs to it ?

Answer: Yes / No


/Mats