David Dreggors wrote: > Dag, this seems confusing to me... > >> No, the kmod-ath5k works, but does have a problem when the interface is >> brought down. > > In this first sentence you say the kmod-ath5k does have a problem when > the interface is brought down. > >> This is not a problem with the kmod-ath5k, it happens with the >> ath5k from 2.6.18-141 and 2.6.18-144 as well (which is a backport of the >> Fedora 10 ath5k module which I presume works fine in F10). > > In this next sentence however says that it (kmod-ath5k) is not where > this issue is but rather it is in the ath5k backport for > 2.6.18-141/2.6.18-144. > > I am lost does this happen on the kmod-ath5k or not? > I believe Dag is saying yes it does happen with kmod-ath5k driver. kmod-ath5k from elrepo.org is a direct backport of the driver present in 2.6.18-141 so they are identical. Any issue suffered by the driver in 2.6.18-141 will also affect kmod-ath5k from elrepo.org. I think Dag was trying to say the problem isn't specific to the kmod version of the driver, but that it happens with the ath5k in 2.6.18-141 and 2.6.18-144 as well. Hope that makes sense :-)