On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote: >> The second approach sounds like more of a slam than living in >> a 'projects.' sub-domain to me. > Which means that there will possibly more than one documentation per > task, e.g. there could be a KVM tutorial in the moderated and one in > the 'open' wiki space. I think people who reinvent wheels in the wrong venue are wasting their time, for the reasons I've gone through before. Others disagree. I get it and proposed a fix to split the difference (a la Solomon with babies) which has no competing alternative that I can see. So what? > If the quality of an article in the 'open' wiki is good enough, who > ports/merges it to the moderated one? Yeah -- that's hard -- export as text from point A, and paste at point B ... impossible. For extra credit, export both files if there is an incumbent in the 'veted' archie and merge diffs (and probably refactor as well). So what? > Sounds quite odd to me, sorry. Cannot help you there. -- Russ herrold