On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centosdocs at gmail.com> wrote: > 2) Follow the currently more popular "community" model that is in use > in other OSS projects. That means the wiki is generally open to > anyone with an account. This model would yield a larger community of > people willing to contribute, at the cost of potentially lower quality > content (however, I don't not believe that will actually be the case). > This model would be a shift in approach from where the project > currently seems to be focused. That's why I asked some questions a few mails ago which nobody has even tried to answer yet :) As said, I'm torn between both models. Model 1 has some advantages where I'd like to be convinced that we can also get that with with model 2. > The model for #2 has an escape valve, which is that all of the messy > "community stuff" can happen in the wiki, while the "official" stuff > that has been discussed here would live on the actual centos web site > outside of the wiki. That already is the case ("official" Documentation is there). Cheers, Ralph