[CentOS-docs] New page: HowTos/JavaRuntimeEnvironment
Alan Bartlett
ajb at elrepo.org
Fri Jun 3 18:42:01 EDT 2011
On 3 June 2011 23:34, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 10:56 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Alan Bartlett wrote on 06/03/2011 03:32 PM:
>>> One comment. I thought linkage of the libjavaplugin_jni.so file is redundant?
>> May be superstitious behavior on my part. I saw it recommended
>> somewhere to use both and have followed that, but it seems to work fine
>> without the libjavaplugin_jni.so link, but the link does not seem to
>> cause problems. That can be deleted if not needed.
> I am 100% sure that on x86_64 libnpjp2.so is enough (that's what I use).
> On the other arch however, if I am not mistaken (I have no i386 system
> handy for testing until Monday) I am accustomed to using
> libjavaplugin_jni .
Just for you, Wolfy, freshly harvested from a working 32-bit system --
[quote]
[ajb at GX1 plugins]$ pwd
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
[ajb at GX1 plugins]$ ls -1
libflashplayer.so
libnpjp2.so
mplayerplug-in-dvx.so
mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt
mplayerplug-in-qt.so
mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt
mplayerplug-in-rm.so
mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt
mplayerplug-in.so
mplayerplug-in-wmp.so
mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt
mplayerplug-in.xpt
nsdejavu.so
[ajb at GX1 plugins]$
[/quote]
Alan.
More information about the CentOS-docs
mailing list