On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: > On Dec 23 17:05, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > > Thank you for your contribution to the discussion. I'm glad you appear to > > understand this was not directed at you personally. > > Certainly no offense was taken here. I'm thankful for people like you > who are looking out for understandability. > > > > > I'm a retired System Administrator. Part of my job was being a > professional > > paranoid about user credentials. At most of the companies where I worked, > > loss or sharing of the company phone book was a firing offense. I > imagine > > that is the source of our difference of opinion. > > With my documentation writer hat on, I can say that I wrote my page that > way out of convenience (rather hastily I might add :) and in the absence > of official style guidelines it was easiest to copy directly from the > screen. Perhaps we can adopt some of the guidelines suggested downthread > by Karsten that will make things more clear. In the meantime I'll work > on generalizing the centpkg page. > > --Brian > Excellent! Thank you. One page at a time is as fast as we can work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20141223/2ce95d59/attachment-0006.html>