[CentOS-docs] Regarding Static website generator [GSOC Docs-toolchain]
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
sankarshan.mukhopadhyay at gmail.comTue Jul 28 03:22:03 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS-docs] Regarding Static website generator [GSOC Docs-toolchain]
- Next message: [CentOS-docs] Regarding Static website generator [GSOC Docs-toolchain]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:47 AM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Lei and I have been working on the project, based on community input. We > have implemented two way sync between github and pagure as suggest by many. > > Now we want build the site and display it to user. There are number of > options mkdocs, hugo(docker uses it now) etc. > > There are pros and cons to each site generator. To use hugo, we need the > user to have hugo installed too, and than he needs to run hugo command to > create a new file, which is big con. > > Mkdocs is great too, but little inflexible we found. You would probably have to do better than just list one reason a piece. > Any suggestions on which tool to use? A good part of this decision is hinged on what are the design considerations you have in place. More importantly, since you'll be developing this, what are your thoughts? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>
- Previous message: [CentOS-docs] Regarding Static website generator [GSOC Docs-toolchain]
- Next message: [CentOS-docs] Regarding Static website generator [GSOC Docs-toolchain]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-docs mailing list