[CentOS-docs] rpmforge references in the wiki

Fri Apr 15 00:04:49 UTC 2016
Tom Sorensen <tsorensen at gmail.com>

Burn the references with fire.

If there are any references to litko then they should be treated equally.
Both are dead.

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch at tigalch.org>
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison:
>
>> Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the
>> wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)...
>>
>> A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to
>> rpmforge.  As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+
>> years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material
>> for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is
>> trusted, epel for example.
>>
>> I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this
>> matter up here.
>>
>
> As allready mentioned +1 from in replacing where possible and removing
> where not.
>
>>
>> Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just
>> a pipedream.  References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki
>> users.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                         John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>
>> all the best
> Christoph
> --
> Christoph Galuschka
> CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20160414/f88894d6/attachment-0004.html>