Burn the references with fire. If there are any references to litko then they should be treated equally. Both are dead. On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch at tigalch.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison: > >> Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the >> wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)... >> >> A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to >> rpmforge. As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+ >> years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material >> for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is >> trusted, epel for example. >> >> I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this >> matter up here. >> > > As allready mentioned +1 from in replacing where possible and removing > where not. > >> >> Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just >> a pipedream. References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki >> users. >> >> >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-docs mailing list >> CentOS-docs at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >> >> all the best > Christoph > -- > Christoph Galuschka > CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20160414/f88894d6/attachment-0006.html>