El 18/9/18 a las 20:07, Karsten Wade escribió: > On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. >> However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and >> we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] >> >> Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a >> violation of the trademark. >> >> [0]: https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo#head-bf605cecf99c819d5a39e726ffb928999e1a13e6 >> [1]: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CentOS#/media/File:CentOS_color_logo.svg > Hi Fabiano, > > Thanks for clarifying and that connects with what Rich said about how > we've used just the graphic logo mark in practice but do not have a > guideline that allows that on the ArtWork wiki. > > This item is actually on my short list of things to clarify for the > trademark guidelines and updates on the ArtWork page. > > For the moment, we can pursue a specific permission for GNOME Boxes. > Can you provide a mock-up of how it would appear on the page? > > I'm looking at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Boxes but am not sure how it > would appear. Am I correct that the logo would appear when running the > GNOME Boxes application inside of a GNOME session? If yes, is there > also a corresponding use on the website? A mock-up from there would be > useful as well. > > Knowing that this has been missed for a few months, I'll work through > the discussions on our side to expedite a decision for you. From someone who doesn't know anything about design/legal, what is the difference between this instance and what was done in point 7.3 of the link (7.3. For special sub-projects)? BTW, that is the logo only; Pablo.
