[CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG: Participation wanted

Wed Jul 1 00:14:36 UTC 2020
Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>

Count me in.


On June 30, 2020 9:20:55 PM GMT+03:00, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi, folks,
>I've been working through the CentOS wiki for more than a year now, 
>trying to identify and fix outdated/wrong/obsolete content. It's a 
>daunting task, and I'm losing.
>I would very much like to gather a group of people who are:
>* Knowledgeable about CentOS
>* Good with words
>* Have a little time
>who would be willing and able to review the content of the wiki, and
>the bits that are incorrect.
>The CentOS Documentation SIG (which doesn't actually exist in any 
>meaningful way) is, according to the wiki:
>responsible for the content of the Wiki, and other public sources of 
>documentation. This includes, but is not limited to:
>* Determining, and imposing, a hierarchy/architecture of content in the
>* Editing/pruning existing content when it is
>* Recruiting subject matter experts to do some of that editing
>* Recruiting translators to keep our various translations in sync
>[Ref: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation ]
>If any of the above appeals to you, I would ask you to let me know. I 
>would like to create a SIG around the wiki. Please let me know if
>interested. I know that there are a number of you who are consistently 
>active on this list. I would like to find a way to give us a little
>power/authority over the wiki to make higher-level editorial decisions 
>about information architecture. Also, having a formal SIG might be a
>to engage more people to join the effort and dedicate some time to it.
>CentOS-docs mailing list
>CentOS-docs at centos.org