I'd love to volunteer too. On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 2:21 AM Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > I've been working through the CentOS wiki for more than a year now, > trying to identify and fix outdated/wrong/obsolete content. It's a > daunting task, and I'm losing. > > I would very much like to gather a group of people who are: > > * Knowledgeable about CentOS > * Good with words > * Have a little time > > who would be willing and able to review the content of the wiki, and fix > the bits that are incorrect. > > The CentOS Documentation SIG (which doesn't actually exist in any > meaningful way) is, according to the wiki: > > responsible for the content of the Wiki, and other public sources of > documentation. This includes, but is not limited to: > > * Determining, and imposing, a hierarchy/architecture of content in the wiki > * Editing/pruning existing content when it is incorrect/outdated/obsolete > * Recruiting subject matter experts to do some of that editing > * Recruiting translators to keep our various translations in sync > > [Ref: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation ] > > If any of the above appeals to you, I would ask you to let me know. I > would like to create a SIG around the wiki. Please let me know if you're > interested. I know that there are a number of you who are consistently > active on this list. I would like to find a way to give us a little more > power/authority over the wiki to make higher-level editorial decisions > about information architecture. Also, having a formal SIG might be a way > to engage more people to join the effort and dedicate some time to it. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs