[CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG: Participation wanted

Tue Jul 7 20:03:32 UTC 2020
Ron Wheeler <rwheeler at artifact-software.com>

I can help.
I have been using CentOS for a long time. Somewhere pre-2000 I think I 
moved my main client from SCO to Linux. I remember starting with 
Mandrake but not sure when I moved them to CentOS.

I am SysOp (and a lot of other things) for a small in-house ISP (web 
sites, email, nexus, svn, DNS) and am setting up a microserves app using 
Spring, Consul, Keycloak, Docker, Kubernetes, etc.

One of my projects is to get Centos running on a rack of raspberry Pis 
to replace all my existing servers.

I don't get involved with OS internals but can help with a System 
Administration POV and a love for fixing English text.
I can read and write a bit of French but probably not enough to be useful.

I don't have a lot of free time but can probably find a few hours a month.

Ron

On 2020-07-07 2:41 p.m., Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/20 10:24 AM, Petr Bokoc wrote:
>> Hi, I only spotted this now. I'm definitely interested and we should 
>> keep docs.centos.org looped in as part of the SIG.
>
> I left docs.centos out of it simply because I have no insight into how 
> that is created. If you do, then *welcome aboard!!!*
>
>> On 6/30/20 8:20 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> Hi, folks,
>>>
>>> I've been working through the CentOS wiki for more than a year now, 
>>> trying to identify and fix outdated/wrong/obsolete content. It's a 
>>> daunting task, and I'm losing.
>>>
>>> I would very much like to gather a group of people who are:
>>>
>>> * Knowledgeable about CentOS
>>> * Good with words
>>> * Have a little time
>>>
>>> who would be willing and able to review the content of the wiki, and 
>>> fix the bits that are incorrect.
>>>
>>> The CentOS Documentation SIG (which doesn't actually exist in any 
>>> meaningful way) is, according to the wiki:
>>>
>>> responsible for the content of the Wiki, and other public sources of 
>>> documentation. This includes, but is not limited to:
>>>
>>> * Determining, and imposing, a hierarchy/architecture of content in 
>>> the wiki
>>> * Editing/pruning existing content when it is 
>>> incorrect/outdated/obsolete
>>> * Recruiting subject matter experts to do some of that editing
>>> * Recruiting translators to keep our various translations in sync
>>>
>>> [Ref: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation ]
>>>
>>> If any of the above appeals to you, I would ask you to let me know. 
>>> I would like to create a SIG around the wiki. Please let me know if 
>>> you're interested. I know that there are a number of you who are 
>>> consistently active on this list. I would like to find a way to give 
>>> us a little more power/authority over the wiki to make higher-level 
>>> editorial decisions about information architecture. Also, having a 
>>> formal SIG might be a way to engage more people to join the effort 
>>> and dedicate some time to it.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>>> CentOS-docs at centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

-- 
Ron Wheeler
Artifact Software
438-345-3369
rwheeler at artifact-software.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20200707/033c7b5b/attachment-0003.html>