Yeah, my issue with Option 2 was that it doesn't reflow. We could get the same side-by-side effect while allowing reflow on smaller screens using CSS flexbox or grid, but I don't know how to do that in asciidoc. Sometimes sites just hand-craft the HTML of the landing page, but I don't want to make work for people. Also, we should consider how well these designs will work with three concurrent streams. On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 18:45 +0200, Tomas Capek wrote: > Hi all, > > while Option 2 was my favorite as well and it looks great on wide > screens, one concern is that it might not look as good on mobile > devices. > > Since we had a sync-up call with Shaun last week, we added Option 4 > which shows collapsible docs lists and categories under each major > version. > > Hope that helps, > Tomas > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:52 PM Amy Marrich <amy at redhat.com> wrote: > > I've only started looking through but I like Option 2. As you said > > the list will get longer and this will ultimately have less > > scrolling then having everything listed vertically/ > > > > Amy > > Amy Marrich > > She/Her/Hers > > Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms > > Red Hat, Inc > > amy at redhat.com > > Mobile: 954-818-0514 > > Slack: amarrich > > IRC: spotz > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:02 AM Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > A team inside Red Hat has been working on upstreaming the RHEL > > > docs to > > > CentOS Stream. I'd like to share the progress and gather some > > > feedback. > > > You can see a preview rendering here: > > > > > > https://redhat.gitlab.io/centos-stream/docs/enterprise-docs/ > > > > > > Sources here: > > > > > > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/docs/enterprise-docs > > > > > > Currently, there are three documents being built for each of > > > Stream 8 > > > and Stream 9. There are a LOT more to come, but it will take > > > time. > > > > > > Questions: > > > > > > * That front page rendering has three options for how to link off > > > to > > > all the documents. Bearing in mind that the list will grow, how > > > would > > > you prefer it presented? > > > > > > * Opinions on the overall look and feel? Using some common > > > centos.org > > > design elements would be nice, but I don't want to block on that. > > > > > > * I've asked in the past what documents people would like Red Hat > > > to > > > prioritize, and gotten some responses. Feel free to keep > > > requesting. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shaun > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > CentOS-docs mailing list > > > CentOS-docs at centos.org > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-docs mailing list > > CentOS-docs at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20220330/1aba3cff/attachment-0002.html>