From arrfab at centos.org Tue Apr 14 11:46:41 2020 From: arrfab at centos.org (Fabian Arrotin) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:46:41 +0200 Subject: [CentOS-mirror-announce] Spring Clean-up (aka removing dead mirrors from crawler/lists) Message-ID: Hi all, When having a look at https://mirror-status.centos.org, I saw that we had quite some mirrors that don't seem to be monitored (despite previous mail sent to PoC) and in bad shape (not reachable or really outdated). Those mirrors are automatically removed from yum/dnf produced lists, but still eats time at the crawler process level when trying to validate/reach out those mirrors. For that reason, I so disabled those mirrors in our DB and such nodes are so gone from https://mirror-status.centos.org/ (which is so now in "good shape") In case your mirror would be impacted (but weren't paying attention to previous mails nor your own monitoring for your pull script), you can still reply on the centos-mirror list *after* you have verified what was wrong and how you fixed it. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From arrfab at centos.org Tue Apr 14 11:46:41 2020 From: arrfab at centos.org (Fabian Arrotin) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:46:41 +0200 Subject: [CentOS-mirror-announce] Spring Clean-up (aka removing dead mirrors from crawler/lists) Message-ID: Hi all, When having a look at https://mirror-status.centos.org, I saw that we had quite some mirrors that don't seem to be monitored (despite previous mail sent to PoC) and in bad shape (not reachable or really outdated). Those mirrors are automatically removed from yum/dnf produced lists, but still eats time at the crawler process level when trying to validate/reach out those mirrors. For that reason, I so disabled those mirrors in our DB and such nodes are so gone from https://mirror-status.centos.org/ (which is so now in "good shape") In case your mirror would be impacted (but weren't paying attention to previous mails nor your own monitoring for your pull script), you can still reply on the centos-mirror list *after* you have verified what was wrong and how you fixed it. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From arrfab at centos.org Tue Apr 14 11:46:41 2020 From: arrfab at centos.org (Fabian Arrotin) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:46:41 +0200 Subject: [CentOS-mirror-announce] Spring Clean-up (aka removing dead mirrors from crawler/lists) Message-ID: Hi all, When having a look at https://mirror-status.centos.org, I saw that we had quite some mirrors that don't seem to be monitored (despite previous mail sent to PoC) and in bad shape (not reachable or really outdated). Those mirrors are automatically removed from yum/dnf produced lists, but still eats time at the crawler process level when trying to validate/reach out those mirrors. For that reason, I so disabled those mirrors in our DB and such nodes are so gone from https://mirror-status.centos.org/ (which is so now in "good shape") In case your mirror would be impacted (but weren't paying attention to previous mails nor your own monitoring for your pull script), you can still reply on the centos-mirror list *after* you have verified what was wrong and how you fixed it. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From arrfab at centos.org Tue Apr 14 11:46:41 2020 From: arrfab at centos.org (Fabian Arrotin) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:46:41 +0200 Subject: [CentOS-mirror-announce] Spring Clean-up (aka removing dead mirrors from crawler/lists) Message-ID: Hi all, When having a look at https://mirror-status.centos.org, I saw that we had quite some mirrors that don't seem to be monitored (despite previous mail sent to PoC) and in bad shape (not reachable or really outdated). Those mirrors are automatically removed from yum/dnf produced lists, but still eats time at the crawler process level when trying to validate/reach out those mirrors. For that reason, I so disabled those mirrors in our DB and such nodes are so gone from https://mirror-status.centos.org/ (which is so now in "good shape") In case your mirror would be impacted (but weren't paying attention to previous mails nor your own monitoring for your pull script), you can still reply on the centos-mirror list *after* you have verified what was wrong and how you fixed it. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From arrfab at centos.org Tue Apr 14 11:46:41 2020 From: arrfab at centos.org (Fabian Arrotin) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:46:41 +0200 Subject: [CentOS-mirror-announce] Spring Clean-up (aka removing dead mirrors from crawler/lists) Message-ID: Hi all, When having a look at https://mirror-status.centos.org, I saw that we had quite some mirrors that don't seem to be monitored (despite previous mail sent to PoC) and in bad shape (not reachable or really outdated). Those mirrors are automatically removed from yum/dnf produced lists, but still eats time at the crawler process level when trying to validate/reach out those mirrors. For that reason, I so disabled those mirrors in our DB and such nodes are so gone from https://mirror-status.centos.org/ (which is so now in "good shape") In case your mirror would be impacted (but weren't paying attention to previous mails nor your own monitoring for your pull script), you can still reply on the centos-mirror list *after* you have verified what was wrong and how you fixed it. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: