Mark Nipper wrote: > On 02 May 2006, Lance Davis wrote: >> One problem is that Apache historically doesnt cope with files larger >> than 2GB , and just refuses to display a directory listing at all when >> such files are present. > > Out of curiosity, what are other people running for their > web server? I'm running Apache 2.2 specifically because I mirror > some things with DVD images which break the 2GB boundary. I was > running Cherokee previously, but found Apache better suited for > my needs. But I'm curious how other, larger mirrors are handling > this. > Running 1.3.27. Why? That's what it was running when I inherited it. I could upgrade to 2.x probably without much headache; the machine doesn't do anything else but mirror, and doesn't need php/mod_perl/wha'eva. If you guys at Centos need us to do that, though, give us a couple of days notice. -- William Dunn Unix / Linux Administrator Virginia Tech Computer Science Department wdunn at cs.vt.edu / 540-231-3167