Mark Nipper wrote: > On 02 May 2006, Lance Davis wrote: >> One problem is that Apache historically doesnt cope with files larger >> than 2GB , and just refuses to display a directory listing at all when >> such files are present. > > Out of curiosity, what are other people running for their > web server? I'm running Apache 2.2 specifically because I mirror > some things with DVD images which break the 2GB boundary. I was > running Cherokee previously, but found Apache better suited for > my needs. But I'm curious how other, larger mirrors are handling > this. > Using 2.0 on kernel.org, but on a 64-bit box. 2.0 doesn't have an inherent problem with large files, but I gather RedHat didn't want to recompile it in such a way to break all the plugins on 32-bit boxes. -hpa