[CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgMon Apr 28 13:38:15 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth
- Next message: [CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Alex, Alex Howells wrote: > httpd access logs are inaccurate, unless you are using mod_logio or > similar; they'll show a complete download amount for partial downloads, > which causes AWstats and Webalizer to become *massively* inaccurate. Thats a good point. I've had a look through some of our ( mirror.centos.org ) aggregated logs ( we only do :80 to the users from there ), and I dont see any spike around the timeperiod Greg said he saw a spike. The OpenOffice update always causes a bit of a ripple, but that tends to settle down fairly quick. Also for new users who are installing from 5.1 media now, they would already have been seeing a previous OOo update, for them its just a case of getting a different rpm, almost exactly the same size. > Reality: bandwidth graphs of the switchport do not correlate, > contacting them was fruitful, default access_log has serious flaws. That does not make them useless or something to ignore, if you are suddenly getting a lot more traffic on the port, the first place to look would still be the logs. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
- Previous message: [CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth
- Next message: [CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-mirror mailing list